<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security And Privacy &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://secpriv.com/category/privacy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://secpriv.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:01:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cyveillance Revisited</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/cyveillance-revisited</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/cyveillance-revisited#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years back, I wrote the article, &#8220;Who Is Cyveillance And Why Should You Care?&#8221; and it&#8217;s been a fairly popular post here at Security &#38; Privacy.  Some weeks ago, I received an email about the article from a &#8220;Ray M.&#8221;  Ray writes,

&#8220;Regarding:
http://secpriv.com/who-is-cyveillance-and-why-should-you-care
I will try and keep this as professional as possible. This organization [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/cyveillance-revisited/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Offers Encrypted Search</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/google-offers-encrypted-search</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/google-offers-encrypted-search#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypted search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google ssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intercepting search engine searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious sites in search engine results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/google-offers-encrypted-search</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wonder if your ISP might be spying on you and intercepting your traffic? Well now you can put your paranoid self to rest as far as your ISP knowing what search terms you are searching on in Google.
Although your search terms might remain a secret between Google and you, technically speaking your ISP (and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/google-offers-encrypted-search/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delete Facebook Part II</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/delete-facebook-part-ii</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/delete-facebook-part-ii#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 03:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delete facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quit facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/delete-facebook-part-ii</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across an interesting rant by Dan Yoder entitled &#8220;10 Reasons to Delete Your Facebook Account.&#8221; As well as privacy concerns, Yoder even mentions a suspicion about the ethics of Facebook Founder, Mark Zuckerburg.
&#8220;Facebook&#8217;s CEO has a documented history of unethical behavior. From the very
beginning of Facebook&#8217;s existence, there are questions about Zuckerberg&#8217;s
ethics. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/delete-facebook-part-ii/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delete Facebook</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/delete-facebook</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/delete-facebook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 02:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delete facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quit facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/delete-facebook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 19, 2010
I deactivated my Facebook profile on March 8, 2010.  Admittedly, there are times I miss it &#8211; especially to play Lexulous.  But Facebook became a major distraction for me in many different ways. There were times I was making Lexulous moves when I should have been working. There were times when things that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/delete-facebook/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Problem With Privacy</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/the-problem-with-privacy</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/the-problem-with-privacy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/the-problem-with-privacy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google maps! Who today lives without them when they are going to be traveling to a destination that they&#8217;ve never driven before? I use google maps all the time and have found it to be a very accurate way to plan my trip by shortest distance or shortest time, and Google will also provide me [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/the-problem-with-privacy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Facebook Breaking Privacy Laws?</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/is-facebook-breaking-privacy-laws</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/is-facebook-breaking-privacy-laws#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/is-facebook-breaking-privacy-laws</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just logged off the popular and well known &#8220;Social Networking&#8221; site, Facebook after playing some Scrabulous moves with some of my friends.  There is no doubt that Facebook can be a great tool for keeping in touch with friends and acquaintances and some of the third party applications such as Scrabulous are popular [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/is-facebook-breaking-privacy-laws/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have The Terrorists &#8220;Won&#8221; In The U.K.?</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/have-the-terrorists-won-in-the-uk</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/have-the-terrorists-won-in-the-uk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/have-the-terrorists-won-in-the-uk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you live in the U.K., and you&#8217;ve just downloaded your email, cleared it off the server, read it, then deleted it from your computer, it just might still exist in a database if a new proposal is successful.
According to The Telegraph:
&#8220;The Home Office will create a database to store the details of every phone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/have-the-terrorists-won-in-the-uk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slip, Slipping Away</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/slip-slipping-away</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/slip-slipping-away#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/slip-slipping-away</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    &#8220;The true criminals will go and use random Wi-Fi nodes where you can get anonymous access,&#8221; he said. &#8220;You haven&#8217;t done anything but increase surveillance of law-abiding citizens.&#8221;
    ~ Jim Harper, Cato Institute, as reported by CNET 
What price for loss of freedom and expectation of privacy are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/slip-slipping-away/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks Not Using Secure Log-In Pages</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/banks-not-using-secure-log-in-pages</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/banks-not-using-secure-log-in-pages#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pgp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/banks-not-using-secure-log-in-pages</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;d think with the vast numbers of phishing attempts, financial institutions would be doing everything they can do to help with preventative measures. But an unofficial survey shows some banks are lagging way behind. 
Johannes Ullrich, SANS &#8220;Handler Of The Day&#8221; on April 19, 2006, checked out some financial institutions&#8217; log in pages. In what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/banks-not-using-secure-log-in-pages/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bizarre Anti-&#8221;Cyber Stalking&#8221; Law</title>
		<link>http://secpriv.com/bizarre-anti-cyber-stalking-law</link>
		<comments>http://secpriv.com/bizarre-anti-cyber-stalking-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 01:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pgp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://secpriv.com/bizarre-anti-cyber-stalking-law</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new US law defines  &#8220;cyber-stalking&#8221; so broadly as to include anything that may be posted anonymously on the Internet that is &#8220;annoying&#8221; to someone.
First, let&#8217;s look at the term &#8220;cyber-stalking.&#8221; While making my own rounds of various blogs, I&#8217;ve come across this term used to describe people who might post comments frequently on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://secpriv.com/bizarre-anti-cyber-stalking-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
